SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 16522

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
ARAVIND KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.THOMAS JOHN AMBOOKEN, SRI.B.SAJEEV KUMAR, SMT.BLOSSOM MATHEW
For the Respondents: GP SRI K JANARDHANA SHENOY

JUDGMENT

When this writ petition came up for consideration, the counsel for the petitioners submitted that, subsequent to the amendment, another writ petition was filed as WP(C) No.22900 of

2020, and this writ petition need not be retained.

Granting liberty to the petitioners to raise all the contentions in WP(C) No.22900 of 2020, this writ petition is closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top