Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 16522
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
ARAVIND KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 22302 OF 2020
Important Points
The court permitted the closure of a writ petition, allowing the petitioners to pursue a related petition for further contentions.
Subject
Writ Jurisdiction - Civil
Headnote
The High Court considered the issues pertaining to WP
(C) No. 22302 of 2020, whereupon the petitioners sought liberty to pursue another related petition (WP
(C) No. 22900 of 2020). The court found that continuation of the former petition was unnecessary and thus ordered its closure, allowing the petitioners to raise their contentions in the latter matter. The ruling ultimately permitted the petitioners to have their legal issues addressed without retention of the first writ petition.
(C) No. 22302 of 2020, whereupon the petitioners sought liberty to pursue another related petition (WP
(C) No. 22900 of 2020). The court found that continuation of the former petition was unnecessary and thus ordered its closure, allowing the petitioners to raise their contentions in the latter matter. The ruling ultimately permitted the petitioners to have their legal issues addressed without retention of the first writ petition.
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.THOMAS JOHN AMBOOKEN, SRI.B.SAJEEV KUMAR, SMT.BLOSSOM MATHEW
For the Respondents: GP SRI K JANARDHANA SHENOY
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.THOMAS JOHN AMBOOKEN, SRI.B.SAJEEV KUMAR, SMT.BLOSSOM MATHEW
For the Respondents: GP SRI K JANARDHANA SHENOY
JUDGMENT
When this writ petition came up for consideration, the counsel for the petitioners submitted that, subsequent to the amendment, another writ petition was filed as WP(C) No.22900 of
2020, and this writ petition need not be retained.
Granting liberty to the petitioners to raise all the contentions in WP(C) No.22900 of 2020, this writ petition is closed.
Sd/-
