SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 16522

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
ARAVIND KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 22302 OF 2020



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.THOMAS JOHN AMBOOKEN, SRI.B.SAJEEV KUMAR, SMT.BLOSSOM MATHEW
For the Respondents: GP SRI K JANARDHANA SHENOY

The court permitted the closure of a writ petition, allowing the petitioners to pursue a related petition for further contentions.

Headnote:The High Court considered the issues pertaining to WP

(C) No. 22302 of 2020, whereupon the petitioners sought liberty to pursue another related petition (WP

(C) No. 22900 of 2020). The court found that continuation of the former petition was unnecessary and thus ordered its closure, allowing the petitioners to raise their contentions in the latter matter. The ruling ultimately permitted the petitioners to have their legal issues addressed without retention of the first writ petition.

JUDGMENT

When this writ petition came up for consideration, the counsel for the petitioners submitted that, subsequent to the amendment, another writ petition was filed as WP(C) No.22900 of

2020, and this writ petition need not be retained.

Granting liberty to the petitioners to raise all the contentions in WP(C) No.22900 of 2020, this writ petition is closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top