IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
MOHAMMED SAJITH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the facts surrounding the ransom and proceedings. (Para 2) |
| 2. the discharge of the 1st accused impacted the case. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's inherent powers to quash. (Para 7 , 8) |
O R D E R
Dated this the 04th day of March, 2026 The petitioners are the accused 2 and 3 in C.C.No.101/2016 on the file of the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Kasaragod, (‘Trial Court’, in short) which has originated from Crime No.121/2013 registered by the Manjeswaram Police Station.
2. The petitioners have filed the Criminal Miscellaneous Case to quash Annexure A1 Final Report and all further proceedings in the above case on the assertion that, by Annexure A2 order, this Court has discharged the 1st accused on the finding that the offences alleged against the 1st accused will not be attracted. In view of Annexure A2 order passed by this Court the substratum of the prosecution case has been lost. Therefore, the proceedings as against the petitioners may be quashed.
3. The prosecution case, in brief, is as follows:
On 02.02.2013, while the de facto complainant was on the way to Mangalapuram Airport to board flight to the Gulf Country where has been working, the 1st accused along
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.