IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G.GIRISH, J
A.SAINULABDEEN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the accusations and context of the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments presented by the petitioners in defense. (Para 4) |
| 3. court's evaluation of evidence and findings. (Para 5 , 6) |
ORDER
The accused Nos.2 and 3 in C.C.No.632/2019 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Attingal, have filed this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to quash the proceedings against them in the aforesaid case. The allegations against the petitioners are in connection with the commission of offence under Section 498A of the IPC r/w Section 34 . 2. The prosecution case is that the petitioners, who are the father-in-law and the second wife of the father-in-law of the defacto complainant, subjected the defacto complainant to cruelty, along with the first accused, demanding more gold ornaments and money. It is stated that the defacto complainant was being subjected to cruelty, after the first accused went abroad in connection with his employment. It is alleged that the second accused (first petitioner) often harassed the defacto complainant by seeking sexual favours. As against the third accused, the allegation is that she was having an illicit relationshi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.