Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 16668
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G.GIRISH, J
DR.A.M.ARUN MANAGING DIRECTOR,VASAN EYE CARE HOSPITAL – Appellant
Versus
THE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER EMPLOYEES' PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION – Respondent
CRL.REV.PET NO. 761 OF 2017
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.SANJAY, SMT.A.PARVATHI MENON
For the Respondents: DR.S.GOPAKUMARAN NAIR (SR.), SHRI.S.PRASANTH, SC, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION, SRI SUDHEER G., PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.SANJAY, SMT.A.PARVATHI MENON
For the Respondents: DR.S.GOPAKUMARAN NAIR (SR.), SHRI.S.PRASANTH, SC, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION, SRI SUDHEER G., PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
A revision petition abates upon the death of the petitioner, preventing any legal continuation without representatives.
Headnote:This case involves a criminal revision petition where the petitioner has passed away without any legal representatives coming forward. The court acknowledged the petitioner's demise and concluded that the matter is abated. The court's final ruling states the revision stands closed due to the death of the petitioner, affirming the legal principle that a deceased petitioner cannot continue a civil petition.
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is reported to be no more, and that so far no person has approached for getting impleaded as legal representatives of the deceased petitioner. In the light of the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the revision stands closed as abated by the death of the revision petitioner.
Sd/-
