Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
ABDUL RASHEED CHIRAYIL – Appellant
Versus
REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition challenges rejection of permit application. (Para 1) |
| 2. court directs compliance with previous orders regarding vehicle production. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. final outcome permits issuance conditioned on compliance. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioner challenges Ext.P4 order passed by the Regional Transport Authority, Malappuram, rejecting an application for a fresh permit on the ground that a ready vehicle was not produced at the time of submission of the application.
2. This court had passed the following interim order on
10.02.2026.
“The writ petition is filed challenging the decision of the respondents rejecting an application preferred by the petitioner for a regular permit, on the ground that the petitioner did not produce a ready vehicle at the time of submission of the application.
2. Petitioner’s application was earlier rejected, which forced him to file W.P.(C) No.6523 of 2025, which was disposed of on 18.02.2025, holding that the legal issue as to whether a ready vehicle was produced is covered by the judgment of the Division Bench in Jaffer v. Usman [2015 (4) KLT 590] and therefore directed the Regional Transport Authority to consider the application without be
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
