Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J
SAHILA.P – Appellant
Versus
HASSAN V.M., RAMEENA V.A – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. transfer of custody case for convenience. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. no objection from respondents regarding transfer. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court allows the transfer. (Para 5) |
ORDER
The petitioner is the wife of Muhammed Suhail.V and the respondents are her parents-in-law. The petitioner seeks for transfer of O.P.No.1948/2025 pending on the files of the Family Court, Palakkad to Family Court, Ottapalam. The original petition is filed by the respondents under the provisions of the Guardians and Wards Act ,1890 with respect to the custody of the minor child of the petitioner.
2. The petitioner has filed M.C.No.67/
2025 before the Family Court, Ottapalam for maintenance. The petitioner submits that the minor child is residing with her at Ottapalam, which is within the jurisdiction of the Family Court, Ottapalam and it is difficult for her to travel to the Family Court, Palakkad to contest the case. It is further submitted that it will be convenient for the respondents also to prosecute the case if it is transferred to Family Court, Ottapalam.
3. Heard Sri.R.Sreehari, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Arun Ashok, the learned counsel for the respondents.
4. The learned couns
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
