IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
YASIR KARIKKAYIL – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks to convert land designation. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court reviews reasons for application rejection. (Para 5) |
| 3. decision for reconsideration based on legal precedents. (Para 6) |
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with following prayers : i) “Call for the records leading up to Exhibits P2 and P3 and set aside the same by the issuance of a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writs, orders or directions; ii) Declare that the property of the petitioner is no longer a paddy land and hence there is no impediment whatsoever in permitting conversion as provided under Section 27A of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act ;
iii) Dispense with the filing of English translation of Vernacular documents;
iv) Grant such other reliefs as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case “ [sic]
2. The petitioner filed a Form-6 application in accordance with Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008. The same is rejected. An appeal is filed. The same is also rejected. Aggrieved by the same, this writ petition is filed.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.