Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
YUNNUS – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's form-6 application rejected without sufficient justification. (Para 2) |
| 2. court hears arguments for and against the application for land conversion. (Para 3) |
| 3. court concludes rejection of the application was arbitrary. (Para 5) |
| 4. directs reconsideration of the application based on judicial principles. (Para 6) |
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with following prayers :
i) “Call for the records leading up to Exhibits P2 and P3 and set aside the same by the issuance of a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writs, orders or directions;
ii) Declare that the property of the petitioner is no longer a paddy land and hence there is no impediment whatsoever in permitting conversion as provided under Section 27A of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act ;
iii) Dispense with the filing of English translation of Vernacular documents; iv) Grant such other reliefs as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. ” [sic]
2. The petitioner filed a Form-6 application in accordance with Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008. The same is rejected. An appeal is filed. The same is also rejected
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
