SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 16810

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V, K. V. JAYAKUMAR, JJ
SUO MOTU – Appellant
Versus
THE PRESIDENT, MALABAR DEVASWOM BOARD – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 21185 OF 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:
For the Respondents: SMT.R.RANJANIE, SC, MALABAR DEVASWOM BOARD, SRI.MAHESH V RAMAKRISHNAN (R3&R4), SMT.ASWINI SANKAR R.S.(R5), SRI.K.RAMAKUMAR (SR.), SHRI.T.RAMPRASAD UNNI, SRI.S.M.PRASANTH, SRI.T.H.ARAVIND

Allegations against the Executive Officer of misappropriation and maladministration were deemed baseless, with the court affirming adherence to legal procedures and absence of evidence supporting claims.

Headnote:(A) Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Section 13 - Writ Petition - Allegations of misappropriation and maladministration against the Executive Officer of the temple - Following a complaint, an inquiry was conducted revealing that accusations lacked factual basis and were frivolous - Court found no merit in claims presented against the Executive Officer and others - Decision to close the writ petition. (Paras 1-30)

(B) Administrative Law - Principles - Public authorities must act in accordance with law, obtaining necessary approvals and engaging stakeholders in decision-making processes to prevent misuse of power. (Paras 20-29)

Facts of the case:
The writ petition was initiated based on a complaint alleging corruption by the Executive Officer of the temple, who was accused of financial misappropriation, unauthorized actions, and issues with staff management without trustee approval.

Findings of Court:
The respondents acted with due authority and followed necessary procedures in their functions; no substantial evidence was found to support the allegations made in the complaint.

Issues: The court addressed whether the allegations of corruption and mismanagement against the Executive Officer were substantiated enough to warrant action.

Ratio Decidendi: The court asserted that allegations must be supported by substantial evidence, and that the Executive Officer had acted within confines of authority and after proper approvals.

Result: Writ Petition is closed.

Table of Content
1. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30)

JUDGMENT

K. V. Jayakumar, J.

This Writ Petition was registered suo motu based on Ext.P2 complaint dated 20.04.2023, submitted by Mr. Sivasankaran C. and Mr. C. Rajan, the devotees of Thirumandhamkunnu Bhagavathi Temple, Angadippuram, Malappuram, against Sri. C.C. Dineshan, the 3rd respondent, alleging series of corrupt practices and malpractices.

2. It is stated in the complaint that Thirumandhamkunnu Bhagavathi Temple (herein after referred to as ‘the temple’) is an ancient temple under the supervisory control of the Malabar Devaswom Board. Pursuant to the order of this Court dated 31.07.2017 in W.P(C) No. 13541 of 2013, the 3rd respondent assumed charge as the Executive Officer of the temple.

3. It is alleged in the complaint that the 3rd respondent cut down the ‘chempakam’ tree situated in the front yard of the temple and built a waiting shed, and an amount of ₹75,000/- was misappropriated by confirming the tender in favour of one K.T. Sunil, the brother of one K.T. Anilkumar, who was a clerk in the temple. The 3rd respondent has misused an amount of ₹25,00,000/- from the Devaswom fund under the guise of renovation of waste water plant, which was functioning properly.

4. The next allegation raised against the 3rd respondent is that he and some other staff sold teak wood worth ₹59,00,000/- bought from Nilambur Forest Depot for the renovation work of the sanctum sanctorum to a private mill and also chopped down approximately 60-70 teak trees situated near the temple courtyard and a multi storied building was constructed without the permission of the Court or the Trustee after demolishing the ‘aana kadu’, ‘ootu pura’ and thereby lakhs of rupees were stolen from the total estimate of ₹2.5 crores for the work by fabricating bills and no completion certificate was produced for the same.

5. It is pointed out that without any permission from the Trustee, Sri. C.C. Dineshan, misusing his position as the Executive Officer, installed C.C.T.V. cameras in the temple and misappropriated an amount of ₹2,00,000/-. The 3rd respondent used the Devaswom vehicles for his personal purposes, thereby causing financial loss to the Devaswom Board.

6. It is further stated that no investigation has so far conducted on the missing of three or four pendants from the “Thiruvabharanam”. It is further alleged that in connection with assigning temple land to the Tourism Department for the renovation of “Chaverthara”, around ₹1.5 crores were misappropriated. The 3rd respondent also withdrew money from the fixed and savings accounts in the name of the temple trustee and transferred it into his personal account with the assistance of the Devaswom Commissioner.

7. The grievance further projected is that the 3rd respondent also reappointed and rendered assistance to various staff who were suspended under various charges, like misappropriation of funds, etc. Disregarding the opposition of the Trustee, the 3rd respondent appointed approximately 20 persons as temporary staff and one Usha was appointed as a sweeper on a permanent basis on the retirement of her mother, Smt. Kunjootti. Later, Kunjootti was reappointed as a Casual Sweeper. The Executive Officer, 3rd respondent, without the approval of the Trustee had also terminated around 30 staff of the temple, who served for around 10-12 years, who made complaints against Devaswom officials

8. It is stated that a complaint dated 16.07.2021 was given to the Vigilance wing of Malabar Devaswom Board in this regard, but no action was taken.

9. It was further alleged that the temple administration painted the Devaswom building in green colour, included people from other religions in the festival committee, and conducted the conference of a political party in the temple ground, all of which have led to controversies. It is also averred that the Audit wing does not perf

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top