IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
ABDUL RAHMAN T.A. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. performance guarantee terms of the contract. (Para 1) |
| 2. court upholds the eligibility for reduced guarantee under pandemic relief. (Para 2 , 3) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is an A class contractor, who was entrusted with the work based on Ext.P1 letter of acceptance dated 05.10.2023 for executing the work named “KIIFB-PWD016-31--Construction of Vellayani bridge connecting Poonkulam and Kakkamoola in Thiruvananthapuram District- General civil works”. As part of the tender conditions, the petitioner is supposed to deposit 5% of the contract value as the performance guarantee. According to the petitioner, insisting for performance guarantee @ 5% is not legally sustainable, in view of Exts.P2 to P4 Government Orders, by which, the performance guarantee was reduced to 3% of the contract value. As the respondents were not prepared to accept performance guarantee of 3% of the contract value, the petitioner has approached this Court seeking the following reliefs:
“a) Issue a writ of mandamus any other appropriate writ order or directions directing the second respondent to permit the petitioner to execute the agreement with respect of the work namely KIIFB-PWD016- 31--Construct
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.