Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
MANU S.B. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. review petition initiation and dismissal rationale. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments presented by the petitioners and respondents. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. criteria for exercising review jurisdiction. (Para 7 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
Muralee Krishna S., J.
This review petition is filed by the petitioners in O.P.(KAT)No.430 of 2025, under Order XLVII Rule 1 read with Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure , 1908, claiming that there is an error apparent on the face of the record in the judgment dated 18.11.2025 passed by this Court in that original petition.
2. O.P.(KAT)No.430 of 2025 was one filed by the applicants in O.A.No.1173 of 2025 on the file of the Kerala Administrative Tribunal, Thiruvananthapuram (‘the Tribunal’ for short), invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging Ext.P2 order dated 23.07.2025 passed by the Tribunal, whereby the Original application filed by the petitioners to direct the 2nd respondent to effect transfer of the petitioners to their home district/field of choice, subject to the availability of the vacancies as a separate class before implementing onl
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
