Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K.NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
REMYA VINOD – Appellant
Versus
THE FEDERAL BANK LTD. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. performance of auction duties by banks amidst pending disputes. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. judicial dismissal of appeals without procedural merits. (Para 4 , 14) |
| 3. implications of bid deposits and securitisation applications. (Para 11 , 12) |
JUDGMENT
Muralee Krishna, J.
The petitioners in W.P.(C)No.39469 of 2025 filed this writ appeal under Section 5 (i) of the Kerala High Court Act , 1958, challenging the judgment dated 20.11.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge in that writ petition.
2. Going by the pleadings in the writ petition, in Ext.P1 E-
Auction notice dated 26.02.2018 issued by the 1st and 2nd respondents pertaining to the immovable property of the 4th respondent measuring an extent of 6.07 ares in Re-Survey No. 96/3 in block No.9 of Nedumbassery Village, which is the secured asset of the financial facility offered to respondents 3 and 4, Sri.Vinod.M.A, who is the husband of the 1st appellant and son of the 2nd appellant, became the successful bidder, and upon payment of 25% of the bid, amounting to Rs.9,00,500/-, the bid was confirmed in his favour. The successful bidder thereafter could not remit the balance 75% of the bid amount, in view of the pendency of S.A.No
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
