SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 16938

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
JAYADAS M.D – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 1130 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.R.REJI, SHRI.M.V.THAMBAN, SMT.THARA THAMBAN, SRI.B.BIPIN, SRI.ARUN BOSE, SMT.JEENA A.V., SHRI.ARJUN R., SHRI.GAUTHAM R KARTHA, SHRI.SHAJI J., SHRI.SHABIN S.
For the Respondents: SMT.SREEJA V.

Pre-arrest bail granted due to insufficient evidence and permissible quantity under applicable law.

Headnote:This application, filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeks pre-arrest bail for the sole accused in Crime No.19/2026 under the Kerala Abkari Act, regarding possession of 500 ml Indian Made Foreign Liquor. The court finds insufficient evidence against the applicant for custodial interrogation, allowing bail with conditions to ensure cooperation with the ongoing investigation. Final ruling allows bail under specified conditions.

Table of Content
1. application for pre-arrest bail regarding possession of liquor. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments presented regarding evidence and innocence. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court's conditions and ruling on bail. (Para 6)

O R D E R

This application is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking pre-arrest bail.

2. The applicant is the sole accused in Crime No.19/2026 of Kottayam Excise Range Office, Kottayam District. The offence alleged is punishable under Section 55 (i)

of the Kerala Abkari Act .

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on

30.01.2026 at 8:15 a.m., the applicant was found in possession of 500 ml of Indian Made Foreign Liquor and Rs.500/- cash near Thiruvarppu Sivan Covil, Thiruvarppu Village, in contravention to the provisions of the Kerala Abkari Act and thereby committed the offence.

4. I have heard Sri.R.Reji, the learned counsel for the applicant and Smt.V.Sreeja, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the above crime. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to bail. The learned Senior Public Prosecutor, on the other hand, submitted that the alleged incident occurred as part of the applicant's intentional criminal acts, and if he is released on bail at this stage, it will affect the course of the investigation.

6. The quantity involved is only 500 ml of Indian Made Foreign Liquor, which is permissible quantity for a person to possess under the Kerala Abkari Act and Rules. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. The investigation is almost over and the recovery has been effected. Considering the allegations made against the applicant, his custodial interrogation seems unnecessary. For these reasons, I find this to be an appropriate case to grant pre-arrest bail to the applicant.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions:-

(i) The applicant shall be released on bail in the event of his arrest on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/investigating officer, as the case may be.

(ii) The applicant shall fully cooperate with the investigation, including subjecting himself to the deemed police custody for discovery, if any, as and when demanded.

(iii) The applicant shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m. and 11.00 a.m. every Saturday until further orders. He shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.

(iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(v) The applicant shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(vi) The applicant shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top