SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 17023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
SHEEBA P.T – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 4742 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.DEEPAK RAJ, SMT.A.S.SHERIN, SMT.ASWATHY K.S., SMT.VARSHA ROSHAN
For the Respondents: ADV. ROBIN RAJ

The court affirmed the need for timely processing of community certificate applications.

Headnote:Statute Analysis: The petitioner seeks the issuance of a Scheduled Caste certificate based on her daughter's status. Facts of the Case: The petitioner belongs to the Hindu-Pulaya community and alleges that her application dated 29.06.2024 for the community certificate is pending.

Findings of Court:
The court directs a timely review of the application.

Issues: The court frames the main question as whether to issue the community certificate.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concludes that appropriate orders must be passed following an inquiry within three months.

Result: The writ petition is disposed of.

Table of Content
1. application for scheduled caste certificate is pending. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court orders prompt consideration and decision on the application. (Para 3)

JUDGMENT

The limited relief sought for by the petitioner is for a direction to the third respondent to consider and dispose of petitioner’s application dated 29.06.2024 submitted for issuance of a Scheduled Caste certificate for her daughter.

2. Petitioner alleges that she belongs to the Hindu-Pulaya community and her husband was a Christian. Petitioner’s daughter had allegedly been brought up as a Hindu Pulaya, and she had applied for grant of community certificate in her favour. The said application is pending consideration with reference No.1764/2024-E2, as is evident from Exhibit-P7 communication issued by the Thahsildar to the third respondent. According to the petitioner, despite the lapse of almost two years, the application for issuance of community certificate has not been disposed of.

3. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader and the learned Standing Counsel for respondents 2 and 3, I am of the view that this writ petition can be disposed of with a direction.

Accordingly, there will be a direction to the third respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders after conducting due enquiry on the application submitted by the petitioner dated 29.06.2024, now bearing file No.1764/2024-E2, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within an outer period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top