Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J
NAZEER P.A. – Appellant
Versus
THE REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner claims incorrect date of birth in passport. (Para 1) |
| 2. respondent confirms no pending application. (Para 2) |
| 3. petitioner allowed to file fresh application for correction. (Para 3) |
J U D G M E N T
According to the petitioner, his actual date of birth is
28.05.1968. However, the same was wrongly shown as 04.02.1960 in his passport. The petitioner has submitted an application before the 1st respondent for correction of date of birth and reissue of passport, as evidenced from Ext.P9 receipt. However, no steps are taken thereon by the 1st respondent. The petitioner has also submitted Ext.P10 affidavit for correction of date of birth. There is no response to Ext.P10 as well.
Accordingly, this writ petition is filed.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Deputy Solicitor General of India.
3. The learned Deputy Solicitor General of India, on instruction, submitted that no application for correction of date of birth of the petitioner is pending consideration before the 1st respondent. However, it is submitted that if the petitioner files fresh application for correction of date of birth, the same will be considered, in accordance with law.
I
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
