BIJU.K.T vs SUB REGISTRAR, KALLADA RENAISSANCE, SINDHU K.T, CATHOLIC SYRIAN BANK

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 17140

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, J
BIJU.K.T – Appellant
Versus
SUB REGISTRAR, KALLADA RENAISSANCE, SINDHU K.T, CATHOLIC SYRIAN BANK – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.ALEX TOM JOSEPH
For the Respondents: SHRI.G.HARIHARAN, SRI.PRAVEEN.H, SMT.K.S.SMITHA, SMT.B.R.SINDU, SRI.V.R.SANJEEV KUMAR, SRI.V.ROHITH, SMT.AFNA V.P.

JUDGMENT

After arguing for some time, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition, with liberty to move the Tribunal seeking appropriate reliefs. Permission granted and this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the afore liberty.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 17140

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMP. V. BALAKRISHNAN, JBIJU.K.T – AppellantVersusSUB REGISTRAR, KALLADA RENAISSANCE, SINDHU K.T, CATHOLIC SYRIAN BANK – Respondent

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, J
BIJU.K.T – Appellant
Versus
SUB REGISTRAR, KALLADA RENAISSANCE, SINDHU K.T, CATHOLIC SYRIAN BANK – Respondent