SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 17140

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, J
BIJU.K.T – Appellant
Versus
SUB REGISTRAR, KALLADA RENAISSANCE, SINDHU K.T, CATHOLIC SYRIAN BANK – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 42886 OF 2025



Important Points

A petitioner has the right to withdraw a writ petition with the liberty to seek appropriate relief from the Tribunal.

Subject

Civil - Writ Jurisdiction

Headnote

Statute Analysis: The court considered applicable laws surrounding the withdrawal of writ petitions as prescribed under procedural rules of the High Court. Facts of the Case: The petitioner, Biju K.T, sought to withdraw his writ petition for appropriate reliefs from the Tribunal and was represented by counsel.

Findings of Court:
The court granted permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the Tribunal.

Issues: The main question framed by the court was whether the petitioner could withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue other relief.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reasoned that the right to withdraw a petition should be honored such that the petitioner retains access to judicial relief avenues.

Result: This writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the afore liberty.

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.ALEX TOM JOSEPH
For the Respondents: SHRI.G.HARIHARAN, SRI.PRAVEEN.H, SMT.K.S.SMITHA, SMT.B.R.SINDU, SRI.V.R.SANJEEV KUMAR, SRI.V.ROHITH, SMT.AFNA V.P.

JUDGMENT

After arguing for some time, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition, with liberty to move the Tribunal seeking appropriate reliefs. Permission granted and this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the afore liberty.

Sd/-

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top