Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SEHLA MOHAMMED BABU – Appellant
Versus
THE AUTHORISED OFFICER UNDER THE PADDY LAND AND WET LAND ACT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the writ petition and its prayers. (Para 1) |
| 2. petitioner's request for a specific direction. (Para 2) |
| 3. court's consideration of the petition. (Para 3) |
| 4. court’s directive regarding timelines. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"i.To issue a writ of mandamus order or other appropriate writ or direction directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext. P2, Form 7 application, numbered as 17/2025/1077213 dated 21.07.2025 under Section 27 A of the KERALA CONSERVATION OF PADDY LAND AND WET LAND ACT 2008 forthwith.
ii.To issue a writ of mandamus or direction to the 3rd respondent to reassess the property under section 6A of the KERALA LAND TAX ACT consequent to the orders passed by the 1st respondent on Ext. P2 application and to make additional entries in the BTR showing the nature of the property as Garden land/ Purayidam.
iii.To issue any other writs order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit on the facts and circumstances of the case.
iv. Petitioner may be permitted to dispense with the filing of translation of the vernacular documents"
[SIC]
2. When this Writ Petition came up for
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
