Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, J
MORE MURUKA & CO. – Appellant
Versus
ICICI BANK LIMITED – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks account de-freezing. (Para 1) |
| 2. respondent confirms the freeze was lifted. (Para 2) |
| 3. writ petition is disposed. (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 04th day of March, 2026
1. The Petitioner has filed this Writ Petition seeking direction to the Respondent No.1 to de-freeze the account maintained by the Petitioner with the Respondent No.1.
2. The learned Standing Counsel for the Respondent No.1 on instructions submitted that though the operation of the account was frozen at the instance of the Respondent No.2, it was subsequently removed on getting further communication from the Respondent No.2, and hence the Petitioner can operate the account.
3. The above-said submission is recorded, and the Writ Petition is disposed of.
Sd/-
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM JUDGE ANB APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO. 43957 OF 2025 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE PARTNERSHIP DEED OF THE PETITIONER FIRM DATED 01/07/2022 Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE INTIMATION LETTER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER REGARDING THE LIEN/ATTACHMENT/FREEZE ON THE ACCOUNT, PETITIONER ENTERPRISE
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
