Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
SUSHAMA P. R. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's appointment details and initial denial. (Para 1) |
| 2. representation by advocates for the petitioner and respondents. (Para 2) |
| 3. judicial examination of administrative order. (Para 3) |
| 4. court's mandate for reassessment of the petitioner's claim. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is stated to be working as U.P.S.A. in the school managed by the 6th respondent herein. She was appointed as above from 2.6.2014 in a retirement vacancy of one Sri. K. Karunakaran, who retired from service on 31.3.2011. However, the appointment of the petitioner as above was not approved for the period up to 1.6.2015; her appointment being approved from 1.6.2015 in another post.
2. Heard Smt. Chinnu Maria Antony, representing Sri. Kaleeswaram Raj, counsel for the petitioner, and Sri. B. Unnikrishna Kaimal, the learned Government Pleader for the respondents.
3. The order at Ext.P2 by the AEO, refusing approval as above, was confirmed by the DEO pursuant to the order at Ext.P4. The petitioner, though she has not challenged the findings in Ext.P4, seeks to rely on the Ext.P10 order of the Deputy Director of Education, as per which there is a clear vacancy with reference to the date on
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
