Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
SULOCHANA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court outlines the requests in the writ petition. (Para 1) |
| 2. background facts concerning the convict's family emergencies. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. court grants emergency parole based on presented circumstances. (Para 6) |
JUDGMENT
The prayers in this Writ Petition (Criminal) filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India are as follows:
“1. Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondents to grant emergency parole Convict No.79/19, Sinoj, for a reasonable period from 25.02.2026 to 15.03.2026 to enable him to assist his aged mother undergoing breast cancer surgey and ailing wife;
2. Declare that denial of emergency parole in the present circumstances would be arbitrary, unreasonable and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.
3. Pass such other and further orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.”
2. The petitioner is the mother of Convict No.79/19 of High Security Prison, Viyyur, who is undergoing imprisonment for life consequent to the conviction and sentence in S.C.No.288 of 2013 on the file of the Additional District & Sessions Court (for the trial of ca
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
