SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 17555

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N.NAGARESH, J
SATHEESH KUMAR T K – Appellant
Versus
KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 47967 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.NIMISHA P. SHANMUGHAN
For the Respondents: SRI.DEEPU THANKAN, SMT.V.A. HARITHA

The court establishes the right to a customized Police Clearance Certificate for employment purposes amidst pending legal issues.

Headnote:The judgment addresses the writ petition seeking to command the respondents not to require a Police Clearance Certificate for service benefits due to the petitioner's involvement in a criminal matter. The Court found the requirement unreasonable and directed the issuance of a customised Police Clearance Certificate reflecting the petitioner's offences. The Court declared that such certification should aid in processing the petitioner's claims for promotion and service benefits. The final order mandates the issuance of the certificate within two weeks, with further reviews to follow.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks clarity on service benefits related to criminal allegations. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court advocates for a customized police clearance certificate for clarity on the petitioner's legal status. (Para 3)

JUDGMENT Dated this the 3rd day of March, 2026 The petitioner, who is an employee of the Kerala State Road Transport Corporation, has approached this Court seeking the following reliefs:

(a) Issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the respondents not to insist upon a Police Clearance Certificate for processing the petitioner’s claim for service benefits including grade promotion and other consequential benefits.

(b) Issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 2nd respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders in Ext.P7 representation forwarded to the 2nd respondent, after giving an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner.

(c) Direct the respondents to grant the petitioner the eligible grade promotion and consequential service benefits, together with all consequential monetary benefits.

2. It is evident from the pleadings and arguments that the petitioner is involved in a criminal offence under Sections 336 and 324 of the IPC in CC No.54/2014 before the Judicial First Class Magistrate’s Court-II, Punalur.

3. Considering the fact that the Police Clearance Certificate is required to the petitioner for employment purpose, I am of the view that respondents 3 and 4 can be directed to consider the application of the petitioner and issue a customised Police Clearance Certificate indicating the offences in which the petitioner is / was involved.

The writ petition is accordingly disposed of directing respondents 3 and 4 to issue customised Police Clearance Certificate to the petitioner. This shall be done within a period of two weeks. On receipt of the customised Police Clearance Certificate, respondents 1 and 2 shall consider and pass orders on Ext.P7 representation within a further period of one month.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top