Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 17566
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
K. A IBRAHIM – Appellant
Versus
REGINA – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 447 OF 2026 | WP(C) NO.32044 OF 2025
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.MANOJ P.KUNJACHAN, SMT.BLESSY MARY SEBASTIAN
For the Respondents: SMT.VIDYA KURIAKOSE, SR. GP
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.MANOJ P.KUNJACHAN, SMT.BLESSY MARY SEBASTIAN
For the Respondents: SMT.VIDYA KURIAKOSE, SR. GP
Compliance with prior court directions negates contempt claims.
Headnote:In the contempt proceedings concerning CON.CASE
(C) No. 447 of 2026, the petitioner contended non-compliance with prior judgment dated 17.11.2025. However, the court clarified that compliance had been confirmed by the learned Government Pleader. Consequently, without evidence of contempt, the case is dismissed. The court noted, ‘If the petitioner is aggrieved by that order, the petitioner is free to challenge the same, in accordance with law.’
JUDGMENT
When this contempt case came up for consideration, the learned Government Pleader submitted that the directions in the judgment dated 17.11.2025 in W.P.(C.) No. 32044/2025 are complied. If that is the case, there is no contempt. If the petitioner is aggrieved by that order, the petitioner is free to challenge the same, in accordance with law.
Recording the submission of the Government Pleader, this contempt case is closed.
Sd/-
