Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 17633
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V, MR. K. V. JAYAKUMAR, JJ
UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE GENERAL MANAGER, SOUTHERN RAILWAY, HEAD QUARTERS OFFICE, PARK TOWN P.O, CHENNAI – Appellant
Versus
LATHIKA – Respondent
RP NO. 1692 OF 2025 | OP (CAT) NO.27 OF 2025
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.MAHESWARY.G., SENIOR PANEL COUNSEL
For the Respondents: ADV. KALA T GOPI
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.MAHESWARY.G., SENIOR PANEL COUNSEL
For the Respondents: ADV. KALA T GOPI
The court upheld the dismissal of a Review Petition due to insufficient grounds for condonation of delay under the Limitation Act.
Headnote:Review Petition filed against order in OP(CAT) No.27/2025 refers to Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The petitioners contended that the delay should be condoned based on statutory provisions and previous orders. The court found no grounds to permit the application for delay, leading to the dismissal of both the application and the review. The final outcome reaffirmed the dismissal of the Review Petition.
ORDER
K. V. Jayakumar, J.
This Review Petition is filed challenging the order of this Court in OP(CAT) No.27/2025 dated 03.04.2025. Along with the Review Petition, the petitioner has also filed a petition under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 .
We have passed a detailed order dismissing the application for condonation of delay (C.M.A.No.1 of 2025). Consequently, the Review Petition is also dismissed.
Sd/-
