Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 17633

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V, MR. K. V. JAYAKUMAR, JJ
UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE GENERAL MANAGER, SOUTHERN RAILWAY, HEAD QUARTERS OFFICE, PARK TOWN P.O, CHENNAI – Appellant
Versus
LATHIKA – Respondent
RP NO. 1692 OF 2025 | OP (CAT) NO.27 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.MAHESWARY.G., SENIOR PANEL COUNSEL
For the Respondents: ADV. KALA T GOPI

The court upheld the dismissal of a Review Petition due to insufficient grounds for condonation of delay under the Limitation Act.

Headnote:Review Petition filed against order in OP(CAT) No.27/2025 refers to Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The petitioners contended that the delay should be condoned based on statutory provisions and previous orders. The court found no grounds to permit the application for delay, leading to the dismissal of both the application and the review. The final outcome reaffirmed the dismissal of the Review Petition.

ORDER

K. V. Jayakumar, J.

This Review Petition is filed challenging the order of this Court in OP(CAT) No.27/2025 dated 03.04.2025. Along with the Review Petition, the petitioner has also filed a petition under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 .

We have passed a detailed order dismissing the application for condonation of delay (C.M.A.No.1 of 2025). Consequently, the Review Petition is also dismissed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 17633

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMMR. RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V, MR. K. V. JAYAKUMAR, JJUNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE GENERAL MANAGER, SOUTHERN RAILWAY, HEAD QUARTERS OFFICE, PARK TOWN P.O, CHENNAI – AppellantVersusLATHIKA – RespondentRP NO. 1692 OF 2025 | OP (CAT) NO.27 OF 2025

The court upheld the dismissal of a Review Petition due to insufficient grounds for condonation of delay under the Limitation Act.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V, MR. K. V. JAYAKUMAR, JJ
UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE GENERAL MANAGER, SOUTHERN RAILWAY, HEAD QUARTERS OFFICE, PARK TOWN P.O, CHENNAI – Appellant
Versus
LATHIKA – Respondent
RP NO. 1692 OF 2025 | OP (CAT) NO.27 OF 2025