IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
FAIJAS M – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dispute regarding eviction based on expired license. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court affirms non-interference in contractual agreements. (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is submitted by the petitioner, who is a person occupying a building owned by the 2nd respondent on the basis of an agreement of license executed between the petitioner and the 3rd respondent. The petitioner was permitted to run the business of a bakery, restaurant and baking unit in the building owned by the 2nd respondent. The period of license granted as per Ext.P1 is already over in the year 2024. Now, Ext.P8 notice dated 24.11.2025 is issued by the 3rd respondent to the petitioner, requiring him to vacate the premises within a period of three months.
2. The petitioner submitted a request to the 2nd respondent to permit him to continue in the building for one year, highlighting certain practical difficulties in vacating the premises within such a short period. The case of the petitioner is that, without considering the same, the 3rd respondent issued a further notice as evidenced by Ext.P12 to vacate the premises within a period of seven days from the date of notice i.e, 24.02.2026. Moreover, the 2nd
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.