IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
MUTHOOTTU MINI NIDHI LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. concerning trademark application and opposition. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. delay caused by ongoing proceedings. (Para 3) |
| 3. court's discretion to expedite proceedings. (Para 4) |
| 4. mandatory timeline for decision. (Para 5) |
JUDGMENT
Petitioner is a private limited company who filed an application for trademark registration for the word 'Muthoottu’. Though the application was numbered on 12.08.2021 as 5084713, an examination report was raised by the Registry of the second respondent. A reply to the examination report was filed by the petitioner and after hearing the issue, the trademark was accepted and advertised in the Trademark Journal on 19.06.2023. Subsequently, the third respondent filed a notice of opposition against the registration of the trade mark with number 1238680. Petitioner filed a counter statement to the aforesaid notice of opposition, which was acknowledged on 07.11.2023 and the third respondent filed evidence under Rule 45 of the Trademark Rules, 2017, beyond the period stipulated and hence petitioner filed an objection against accepting the evidence.
2. According to the petitioner, the second respondent has not taken further steps to conclude the opposition pr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.