IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
V. VAMADEVAN – Appellant
Versus
REMYA M. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. consideration of interim maintenance order and its implications. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented regarding the maintenance petition. (Para 4) |
| 3. court directives regarding trial expediting. (Para 5) |
JUDGMENT
The challenge in this original petition is to Ext.P5 order whereby the Family Court, Attingal granted interim maintenance to the respondents at the rate of Rs.3,500/- (Rupees Three Thousand Five Hundred Only) each per month.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, the learned Family Court Judge has not recorded any reason for granting interim maintenance to the respondents.
3. The relevant portion of Ext.P5 reads thus:-
“1) The petitioners in the MC filed this application seeking interim maintenance from the respondent.
2) The petitioners' case briefly stated is the following: The respondent is the husband of the 1st petitioner. The 2nd petitioner is their son. The respondent is working abroad and earns more than 80,000/- as monthly income. The respondent has been neglecting to provide maintenance to the petitioners from 12/05/2019. The 1st petitioner is working as a staff nurse at Sree Gokulam Medical College, Venjaramoodu. According to her,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.