SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 17921

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
INDIA EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH – Appellant
Versus
JOY P.U. – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ, KUM.THULASI K. RAJ, SMT.APARNA NARAYAN MENON, SMT.CHINNU MARIA ANTONY
For the Respondents: SRI.M.P.ASHOK KUMAR, SRI.JAYAKUMAR NAMBOOTHIRI

O R D E R

This review petition is filed to review the judgment dated

29.10.2025 in W.P.(C.) No. 38967/2025. According to the review petitioner, the review petitioner is the 4th respondent in the writ petition. Notice is not served to the petitioner. Before serving notice, impugned judgment is passed. This Court verified the same. I think there is force in the argument of the review petitioner. Therefore, the judgment can be recalled and the writ petition can be restored.

Therefore, the review petition is allowed. The judgment dated 29.10.2025 in W.P.(C.) No 38967/2025 is recalled and the writ petition is restored.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top