Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, M.B. SNEHALATHA, JJ
MUHAMMED SINSAR – Appellant
Versus
SHIFA SHERIN – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. privacy concerns in accessing personal phone records. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. claims regarding the necessity of evidence. (Para 3) |
| 3. privacy laws prevent unauthorized inquiries. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. ultimate dismissal of petitions based on findings. (Para 6) |
Devan Ramachandran, J.
The petitioners in both these cases assail orders of the learned Family Court, Malappuram, in IA No.4/2026 in OP No.49/2024 and IA No.5/2026 in OP No.1058/2024 because, it has rejected their request for summoning the ‘Call List’ of a particular number and documents with respect to it.
2. The learned Family Court has found that the ‘Call List’, which has been sought for, relates to a phone number belonging to the mother of the respondent – wife; and that an inquiry into the same, without her knowledge or permission, can never be allowed. The learned Court has also held that, there is no evidence, as of now, that the respondent has used the phone number exclusively during any period of time.
3. Sri.K.Mohanakannan – learned counsel for the petitioners, argued that the findings of the learned Family Court are cursory and without any supporting opinion; and that this is manifest from the non-speaking nature of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
