SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 18034

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. V. JAYAKUMAR, J
JITTO JOSE – Appellant
Versus
GEORGEKUTTY POULOSE – Respondent
CRL.REV.PET NO. 2512 OF 2012 | CRL.A NO.170 OF 2009 | CC NO.325 OF 2004



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.VINUCHAND
For the Respondents: SRI. ALEX M THOMBRA, SENIOR PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Completion of sentence results in closure of revision petition regarding offenses under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Headnote:The revision petition impugns the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge in Criminal Appeal No.170/2009, regarding a Section 138 offense under the Negotiable Instruments Act, where the appellant was found guilty and sentenced to imprisonment and compensation. The appellate court modified the sentence. In light of the appellant's completion of sentence, the matter was closed. The court finds no further matters pending.

Table of Content
1. impugns judgment under section 138. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. completion of sentence acknowledged. (Para 4)
3. revision petition closed. (Para 5)

ORDER

This revision petition is preferred impugning the judgment of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Thodupuzha in Criminal Appeal No.170/2009 for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act . The above appeal was preferred, challenging the judgment dated 26.08.2009 in C.C No. 325/2004 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Kattappana, whereby the accused was found guilty.

2. The trial court sentenced the revision petitioner to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay a compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for a further period of three months.

3. The appellate court, as per the impugned judgment, modified and reduced the sentence of imprisonment till rising of the Court and a fine of Rs.2,00,000/- with a default clause.

4. When the matter was taken up today, the learned counsel for the revision petitioner submitted that he had already undergone his sentence and filed a memo to that effect.

5. In view of the above submission, nothing survives in this matter and this Criminal Revision Petition is closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top