Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
MAKARAJOTHI PANCHAMI SWAYAM SAHAYASANGHAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction and prayers of the petitioner. (Para 1) |
| 2. petitioner's satisfaction with consideration of ext.p15. (Para 2) |
| 3. directive for expeditious decision-making. (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"(i) to issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, calling for the records leading to the issuance of Exts. P8, P12 and P16 and to quash the same;
(ii) to issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, calling for the records leading to the issuance of Exts. P4 and quash the same to the extent it stipulates a rent of Rs. 54,823/-;
(iii) to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, directing the Respondents to re- determine the rent and security deposit payable by the Petitioner strictly in accordance with Ext. P1 Government Circular, Ext. P2 Bye-laws, and Exts. P6 and P7 Government Orders, and to refund to the Petitioner any amounts collected in excess thereof;
(iv) to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, directing the Respondents to grant to the Petitioner the full benefits Exts. P6 and
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
