Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
BIJU K G – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. transfer administrative decision rationale. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. need for supervisory review. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. limits of article 227. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 4. law on transfers clarified. (Para 10 , 12) |
| 5. consequences of omitting parties. (Para 14 , 16) |
| 6. judicial restraint in administrative matters. (Para 18 , 20) |
JUDGMENT
Anil K. Narendran, J.
The petitioner-applicant filed O.A.(EKM)No.1756 of 2025 on the file of the Kerala Administrative Tribunal, Additional Bench at Ernakulam, invoking the provisions under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 , to set aside Annexure A8 order No.2809/2025 LSGD dated 14.11.2025 of the 1st respondent State and to permit him to continue as Assistant Secretary at Ambalavayal Grama Panchayat, till the general transfer; an order directing the 2nd respondent Principal Director, Principal Directorate of Local Self Government Department, to pay him salary from 29.09.2025 onwards.
2. In O.A.(EKM)No.1756 of 2025, the 3rd respondent Secretary, Ambalavayal Grama Panchayat, filed Ext.P3 reply statement dated 19.01.2026, opposing the reliefs sought for. After considering the rival contentions, the Tribunal by Ext.P4 order dated 18.02.2026, dismisse
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
