Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
DENNY – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the court acknowledges the request for administrative efficiency. (Para 1) |
| 2. the petitioner seeks judicial direction for timely application consideration. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. the court provides explicit timelines for the respondents. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"i) To issue a Writ of Mandamus or such other Writ, Order or direction to the 1st respondent to dispose Ext.P3 application (Form 7) submitted by the petitioner in view of Ext.P2 within 1 month.
ii) To direct the 1st respondent to issue further orders to the Tahasildar to make reassessment of the tax and to make appropriate changes in the revenue records by the Village Officer as provided under R.12(10).
iii) To dispense with the production of English translation of documents in Vernacular languages.
iv) To grant such other reliefs that are deemed fit and proper in the interest of justice."
[SIC]
2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext. P3 Form – 7 application within a time frame.
3. Heard the learned counsel for th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
