IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN, J
SINDHU – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's challenge to the tribunal order on maintenance. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's determination on the appeal rights and evidence examination. (Para 3 , 4) |
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following prayers:
“i. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ directing the first respondent to reconsider her appeal and pass speaking orders.
ii. Issue a declaration to the effect that section 16 of the Senior citizens act is unconstitutional, violative of natural right.
iii. Pass such any other order, direction or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the interest of justice, equity and good conscience.”
2. The petitioner is a widow and the daughter of the 4th respondent. The 4th respondent has other daughters, who were not made parties before the tribunal. The 4th respondent approached the maintenance tribunal seeking maintenance of ₹2,500/- per month. The tribunal, after considering the complaint and hearing the parties, passed Ext.P1 order directing the petitioner herein to pay an amount of ₹2,500/- per month and also directing her not to expel the mother from the house where the petitioner is residing. Challenging Ext
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.