Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
K.P.ABRAHAM – Appellant
Versus
HINDUSTAN PREFAB LTD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the construction contract and delays. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioner's claims for reliefs stated. (Para 4) |
| 3. respondent's counter and opposition to claims. (Para 5 , 8) |
| 4. court's consideration of arguments and context. (Para 6 , 7 , 9) |
| 5. details of allegations and evidence regarding claims. (Para 10 , 12 , 13) |
| 6. court's reasoning on jurisdiction and disputed facts. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is an approved Government Contractor, who used to undertake Civil Contracts awarded by the Central Public Works Department and other Government Departments. As part of the same, the petitioner undertook the work awarded by the 1st respondent, for the construction of a mall named “Suburban Mall” at Piravom in Ernakulam District. The said Mall was being constructed by the 1st respondent for the purpose of the 3rd respondent, the Kerala State Civil Supplies Corporation and the 1st respondent was the implementing agency. Based on the same, an agreement was executed on 25.02.2015, between the petitioner and the 1st respondent. The 2nd respondent is the Regional in charge of the 1st petitioner and as per the terms and the conditions of the same, the work ou
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
