IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Easwaran S., J
Pootham Kuzhiyil Premanandan – Appellant
Versus
Thuvasseri Devi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. property ownership and prior claims (Para 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding title and possession (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's examination of legal standing (Para 6 , 8) |
| 4. possession without title suffices for injunction (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. title claim implications in injunction suits (Para 11 , 12) |
| 6. affirmation of previous court findings (Para 13) |
JUDGMENT
Thes appeals are at the instance of the defendants in a suit for injunction.
2. The brief facts necessary for the disposal of the appeal are as follows;
2.1. The plaint schedule property originally belonged to Areekkara Tharwad. O.S. No. 3 of 1945 was instituted before the Sub Court, Kozhikode seeking partition of the plaint schedule property. In the said suit, a Receiver was appointed. One Thuvasseri Imbachan obtained the suit property and other properties on an oral verumbattam, from the Receiver. Since then, it is claimed that he was in possession of the property. As per a final decree in the suit for partition, a share over the property was given to one Areekkara Kunhipennu. As per the will executed by the said Kunhipennu, the jenm right became vested with Poothamkuzhiyil Kandakutty. Thereafter, it is stated that Thuvasseri Imba
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.