K. NATARAJAN.J This Writ Appeal is filed by the appellant as against the order passed by the learned Single judge of this court in W.P(C)No. 33880/2025 dated 16. 10.2025.

2. We have heard the arguments of the learned counsel for the appellant and learned Government pleader as well as learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1 herein.

3. The case of the appellant is that Respondent No. 1 filed a writ petition seeking four reliefs, and the fourth relief as well as the interim relief claimed in the writ petition are one and the same. Therefore, issuing a direction in the interim order passed by the learned Single Judge is nothing but granting the main relief No.4 in the writ petition. Therefore the order under challenge is not sustainable under the law and also directing the respondent nos. 2 and 3 for issuing permit is also not within the purview of the court. It has to be decided by the Authorities and therefore prayed for setting aside the same.

4. Per contra, the learn