SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 18653

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
PAULY KANNUKADAN MATHEW – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 5409 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.B.S.SURESH, SMT.LAKSHMI SURESH, SHRI.VIPIN VIJAYAN, SRI.T.S.SREEKUMAR
For the Respondents: SMT. AMMINIKUTTY K., SRI.RAJEEV JYOTHISH GEORGE

The court emphasized the right to withdraw a writ petition voluntarily, confirming that such requests can be permitted under law.

Headnote:Statute Analysis: The petitioner sought to withdraw Writ Petition WP

(C) No. 5409 of 2026 in the High Court under specific provisions relevant to such petitions. Facts of the Case: The petitioner, Pauly Kannukadan Mathew, filed a writ petition which came up for admission on 13.03.2026.

Findings of Court:
The court granted permission to withdraw the petition.

Issues: The court addressed the petitioner's request effectively and precisely as it concerned the withdrawal of the writ petition.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's reasoning emphasized the importance of an individual's rights to withdraw legal proceedings voluntarily.

Result: Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the Writ Petition.

Permission is granted. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top