SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 18653

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
PAULY KANNUKADAN MATHEW – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 5409 OF 2026



Important Points

The court emphasized the right to withdraw a writ petition voluntarily, confirming that such requests can be permitted under law.

Subject

Civil - Writ Petition

Headnote

Statute Analysis: The petitioner sought to withdraw Writ Petition WP

(C) No. 5409 of 2026 in the High Court under specific provisions relevant to such petitions. Facts of the Case: The petitioner, Pauly Kannukadan Mathew, filed a writ petition which came up for admission on 13.03.2026.

Findings of Court:
The court granted permission to withdraw the petition.

Issues: The court addressed the petitioner's request effectively and precisely as it concerned the withdrawal of the writ petition.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's reasoning emphasized the importance of an individual's rights to withdraw legal proceedings voluntarily.

Result: Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.B.S.SURESH, SMT.LAKSHMI SURESH, SHRI.VIPIN VIJAYAN, SRI.T.S.SREEKUMAR
For the Respondents: SMT. AMMINIKUTTY K., SRI.RAJEEV JYOTHISH GEORGE

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the Writ Petition.

Permission is granted. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top