IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
M.D. SUNILKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
THE DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition seeks mandamus for payment obligations. (Para 1) |
| 2. court references supreme court decision and limits writ petition scope. (Para 2) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is submitted by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:
“i. To issue a writ of mandamus, or any appropriate writ or order directing the 2nd respondent to properly consider the invoices submitted by the petitioner as per the Ext-P1 tender condition and Ext-P2 and Ext-P4 agreements and Ext-P3 work order.
ii. To declare that insisting internet and google map for calculating the distance travelled in connection with transportation of seed is against Ext-Pl tender condition and it is void.
iii. To declare that the 2nd respondent is legally bound to pay the amounts in the terms and conditions of the Ext-P1 tender condition and Ext-P2 and Ext-P4 Agreements.
iv. To issue a writ of mandamus, or any appropriate writ or order directing the 2nd respondent to pay the balance amount Rs. 25,47,153.46/- (Twenty five lakhs forty seven thousand one hundred and fifty three rupees and forty-six paisa only) with 10% interest.
v. To issue such other orders, writs or directions as are deemed fit by this Hon'ble Cou
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.