Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. JAYACHANDRAN, J
SUNRISE ACADEMY OF MEDICAL SPECIALITIES (INDIA) PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 8992 OF 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court hears arguments from both parties. (Para 1) |
| 2. order for timely disposal of the appeal. (Para 2) |
| 3. judgment permits hearing for all affected parties. (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3. In view of the innocuous nature of the Order to be passed, notice to respondent No.4 is dispensed with. Ext.P3 is the appeal preferred by the petitioner, challenging Ext.P2 Order. The same is pending before the 2nd respondent. Petitioner seeks an expeditious disposal of the same.
2. Resultantly, this Court directs the 2nd respondent to consider and pass Orders on Ext.P3 appeal in accordance with law, expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance.
3. Needless to say that the petitioner, as also, the 4th respondent and any other affected party shall be afforded with an opportunity of being heard before taking a call on Ext.P3.
This Writ Petition will stand allowed.
Sd/-
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
