SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 18955

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
NISSARUDHEEN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 1404 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.N.SUNIL JOSEPH, SRI.B.BIPIN, SMT.ARYA HARSHAN
For the Respondents: SRI.M.C. ASHI, SR. PP

Defendants entitled to bail due to lack of evidence for continued detention.

Headnote:The application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking regular bail for the accused under the Wild Life Protection Act, 1972. The applicants are accused of illegally transporting a Schedule I wildlife species for sale. The court found insufficient evidence connecting the applicants to the crime and stated, 'the applicants are entitled to be released on bail.' The court ruled to allow the application with specific conditions attached.

Table of Content
1. illegal possession of wildlife species. (Para 2 , 3)
2. arguments for and against bail. (Para 5)
3. granting of bail under specified conditions. (Para 6)

O R D E R

This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS )

seeking regular bail.

2. The applicants are the accused Nos.1 and 2 in O.R.

No.5/2026 of Anchal Forest Range Office, Kollam District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 2 (16), 2(36), 2(37), 9, 39, 48A, 50 & 51 of Wild Life Protection Act, 1972.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the accused No. 1 to 5 jointly secured the possession of a Schedule I part C wildlife species by name Red sand boa, illegally transported the same in a private vehicle bearing number KL 25-S-0736, with the intention of selling it to third parties on 25.02.2026 at Valathungal Division within Anchal Range and thereby committed the offences.

4. I have heard Sri.N.Sunil Joseph, the learned counsel for the applicants and Sri.M.C.Ashi, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicants submitted that the applicants are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicants with the alleged crime; hence, they are entitled to bail. On the other hand, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicants, and they are not entitled to bail at this stage.

6. The applicants were remanded to judicial custody on 25.02.2026. The investigation is almost over and the recovery has already been effected. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. For these reasons, I do not find any reason to hold that the continued detention of the applicants is required for any purpose. Hence, the applicants are entitled to be released on bail.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions: -

(i) The applicants shall be released on bail on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) each with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Magistrate/Court.

(ii) The applicants shall fully co-operate with the investigation.

(iii) The applicants shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m and 11.00 a.m every Saturday until further orders. They shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.

(iv) The applicants shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(v) The applicants shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(vi) The applicants shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of the bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.

Sd/-

DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, JUDGE

APA

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top