SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 19005

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
P.RADHAKRISHNAN – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.P.A.JENZIA

JUDGMENT

This writ petition is submitted by the petitioner challenging Ext.P6, by which the contract was terminated. Today when the matter came up for consideration, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that subsequent to the filing of this writ petition, the time to complete the work is extended by the respondents and the petitioner is now continuing with the work.

In such circumstances, this writ petition is closed without prejudice to the contentions of the petitioner.

Sd/-

ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.

JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top