Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 19005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
P.RADHAKRISHNAN – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 35060 OF 2025
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.P.A.JENZIA
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.P.A.JENZIA
Court affirmed a petitioner’s right to continue contract work following permitted extension by the respondent.
Headnote:This writ petition challenges the termination of a contract (Ext.P6). The petitioner indicated that the work time has been extended, allowing continuation of the project. The court closed the petition without prejudice to the petitioner's contentions. [Para 1-2]
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is submitted by the petitioner challenging Ext.P6, by which the contract was terminated. Today when the matter came up for consideration, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that subsequent to the filing of this writ petition, the time to complete the work is extended by the respondents and the petitioner is now continuing with the work.
In such circumstances, this writ petition is closed without prejudice to the contentions of the petitioner.
Sd/-
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
JUDGE
