Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 19097
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
ARIA MOTORS – Appellant
Versus
RAVIKUMAR T.R – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 21375 OF 2025
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN, SHRI.WINSTON K.V, SMT.ANU JACOB, SMT.ANJANA KRISHNAN, SMT.ANJANA A.S
For the Respondents: SRI.R.SREEHARI, SHRI.HAMZA A.V.
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN, SHRI.WINSTON K.V, SMT.ANU JACOB, SMT.ANJANA KRISHNAN, SMT.ANJANA A.S
For the Respondents: SRI.R.SREEHARI, SHRI.HAMZA A.V.
The court confirmed the dismissal of applications by the State Commission while allowing the petitioner to preserve the right to further challenge the decision.
Headnote:This writ petition seeks direction to the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission for considering applications and passing appropriate orders. The applications were dismissed by the State Commission. The Court closed the writ without prejudice to petitioner's right to challenge the order.
Result: Writ petition closed.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks direction for application consideration. (Para 1) |
| 2. writ petition concluded; dismissed applications. (Para 2) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is submitted by the petitioner, seeking a direction to the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Thiruvananthapuram, to consider Exts.P3 to P5 applications and to pass appropriate orders thereon.
2. Today when the matter came up for cosideration, it is submitted that the said applications are dismissed by the State Commission.
In such circumstances, this writ petition is closed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to challenge the order passed by the State Commission.
Sd/-
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
JUDGE
DG/16.3.26
