IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
ARIA MOTORS – Appellant
Versus
RAVIKUMAR T.R – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks direction for application consideration. (Para 1) |
| 2. writ petition concluded; dismissed applications. (Para 2) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is submitted by the petitioner, seeking a direction to the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Thiruvananthapuram, to consider Exts.P3 to P5 applications and to pass appropriate orders thereon.
2. Today when the matter came up for cosideration, it is submitted that the said applications are dismissed by the State Commission.
In such circumstances, this writ petition is closed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to challenge the order passed by the State Commission.
Sd/-
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
JUDGE
DG/16.3.26
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.