Failure to provide notice to parties may result in procedural errors necessitating correction to uphold fair process.

ORDER

Dated this the 13^th day of March, 2026 W.P.(C) No.43960/2025 was disposed of directing the 1^st respondent to consider Ext.P7 Revision Petition and pass appropriate orders thereon within a period of three months.

2. The review petitioners submit that the judgment was delivered without notice to the review petitioners and any decision taken pursuant to Ext.P7 is likely to affect the review petitioners. Therefore, there is error apparent on the face of the judgment.

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the review petitioners, the learned counsel appearing for the 1^st respondent and the learned Government Pleader representing respondents 2 to 6.

4. The Government Pleader submits that even though there was no direction to give notice to parties, the 1^st respondent had issued notice to the review petitioners on 15.11.2025 requiring to appear for hearing on 11.12.2025.

The review petitioners did not appear.

5. Be that as it may, as any orders passed pursuant to the judgment is likely to affect the review petitioners, the review petitioners should also be heard in the matter.

The Review Petition is accordingly disposed of clarifying that while considering Ext.P7 and before passing final orders thereon as directed by this Court in the judgment dated 24.11.2025 in W.P.(C) No.43960/2025, further notice should be given to the review petitioners also.

Sd/-