Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
SETHUMADHAVAN.T.N – Appellant
Versus
MAINTENANCE TRIBUNAL, THRISSUR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner claims neglect by children post property transfer. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner disputes family decisions regarding care and property. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court emphasizes family dispute nature and earlier authority findings. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. court records financial support offered to petitioner. (Para 8) |
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner is the father of respondent Nos. 3 and 4.
The petitioner had filed an application under the provisions of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (for short “Act”), contending that after transferring the property in favour of respondent Nos. 3 and 4, the said respondents are not taking care of him.
2. The issue was considered by the original authority and he passed the order at Ext. P3 dated 14.01.2022. The original authority categorically found that, apart from the party respondents therein, the petitioner also has another son, namely Prabath T.S., and that the said Prabath T.S. is looking after the affairs of the petitioner. The said authority also recorded the undertaking made by the party respondents to the effect that they are ready and willing to take care of their father. It was also found th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
