Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 19186
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A. ABDUL HAKHIM, J
P.C. CHANDRAKUMARI – Appellant
Versus
DR. K.A. RATHEESH – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 2890 OF 2024 | WP(C) NO.7365 OF 2011
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.SHAJI THOMAS, SRI.JEN JAISON, SHRI.THOMASKUTTY SEBASTIAN
For the Respondents: SRI.C.UNNIKRISHNAN (KOLLAM), SRI.TONY AUGUSTINE, GP
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.SHAJI THOMAS, SRI.JEN JAISON, SHRI.THOMASKUTTY SEBASTIAN
For the Respondents: SRI.C.UNNIKRISHNAN (KOLLAM), SRI.TONY AUGUSTINE, GP
The court recognized compliance with its earlier order, thereby concluding the contempt proceedings.
Headnote:This judgement addresses the fulfillment of an earlier court order, determining that compliance has been achieved. The court's findings establish that the necessary conditions for concluding the contempt proceedings have been met, resulting in the closure of the case. The final order reflects this outcome explicitly.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. compliance with court order established. (Para 1) |
| 2. contempt case closed. (Para 2) |
JUDGMENT
1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order is complied with.
2. Accordingly, this Contempt of Court Case (Civil) is closed.
Sd/-
