Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 19186

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A. ABDUL HAKHIM, J
P.C. CHANDRAKUMARI – Appellant
Versus
DR. K.A. RATHEESH – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 2890 OF 2024 | WP(C) NO.7365 OF 2011

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.SHAJI THOMAS, SRI.JEN JAISON, SHRI.THOMASKUTTY SEBASTIAN
For the Respondents: SRI.C.UNNIKRISHNAN (KOLLAM), SRI.TONY AUGUSTINE, GP

The court recognized compliance with its earlier order, thereby concluding the contempt proceedings.

Headnote:This judgement addresses the fulfillment of an earlier court order, determining that compliance has been achieved. The court's findings establish that the necessary conditions for concluding the contempt proceedings have been met, resulting in the closure of the case. The final order reflects this outcome explicitly.

Table of Content
1. compliance with court order established. (Para 1)
2. contempt case closed. (Para 2)

JUDGMENT

1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order is complied with.

2. Accordingly, this Contempt of Court Case (Civil) is closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 19186

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMM.A. ABDUL HAKHIM, JP.C. CHANDRAKUMARI – AppellantVersusDR. K.A. RATHEESH – RespondentCON.CASE(C) NO. 2890 OF 2024 | WP(C) NO.7365 OF 2011

The court recognized compliance with its earlier order, thereby concluding the contempt proceedings.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A. ABDUL HAKHIM, J
P.C. CHANDRAKUMARI – Appellant
Versus
DR. K.A. RATHEESH – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 2890 OF 2024 | WP(C) NO.7365 OF 2011