IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
AJMI.A.R – Appellant
Versus
THE DIRECTOR JUBILEE MISSION MEDICAL COLLEGE AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the court rules that the fee regulatory committee must establish fee structures based on actual expenditures. (Para 1) |
| 2. the review petition is formally closed. (Para 4) |
Anil K. Narendran, J.
The petitioners, who are third parties to W.P.(C)No.19192 of 2019, have filed this review petition, seeking review of the judgment dated 19.05.2020 of a Division Bench of this Court in that writ petition. By the said judgment, W.P.(C)No.19192 of 2019 and connected matters, were allowed by setting aside the impugned orders and the 2nd respondent Fee Regulatory Committee was directed to consider the matter afresh in the light of the observations contained therein, after affording sufficient opportunity to the writ petitioners to explain their statements. Paragraphs 15 to 19 and also the last paragraph of the said judgment read thus;
“15. Of course, in terms of Section 11 no rules have been prescribed. But while determining the fee of a private medical Institution, Section 11 lays down certain parameters which are required to be taken note of, before finalising the fee. We have made an attempt by calling upon the respective colleges to provide the details of the expenditure in
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.