IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
SUDHAKARA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application seeks bail under bnss. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. credibility of allegations considered for bail. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. deemed custody sufficient for investigation. (Para 8) |
| 4. conditions imposed for granted bail. (Para 9) |
O R D E R
This application is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking pre-arrest bail.
2. The applicant is the accused in Crime No.1/2026 of Kasaragod Vanitha Police Station, Kasaragod District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 376(2)(n) and 506 of the Indian Penal Code , 1860.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the applicant had committed penetrative sexual assault on the survivor, a resident of Kidoor in Kidoor Village, during 1995 in the room near ASBS School, Ichilampady, and in 2023 from June to October, in a lodge at Bekal, situated on the upstairs of KVR show room, also threatened to kill her and family and thereby committed the offences.
4. I have heard Sri.S.Rajeev, the learned counsel for the applicant, Smt.Sruthy N. Bhat, the learned counsel for the additional respondent No.3 and Sri.M.C.Ashi, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case
Sushila Aggarwal and Others v. State (NCT of Delhi) and Another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.