Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
MOOSA THIRUVANGOTH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. bail denied due to applicant's absence. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. applicant's counsel presented arguments for bail. (Para 4) |
| 3. court reiterates jurisdiction for anticipatory bail. (Para 5) |
| 4. discretion not exercised in favor of the applicant. (Para 6) |
O R D E R
This application is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking pre-arrest bail.
2. The applicant who is the accused No.1 in Crime No.613 of
2023 of Vatakara Police Station, Kozhikode District (Crime Branch Crime No.2980/CB/EOW & KKD/WYD/R/2023) and at present abroad has approached this Court seeking pre-arrest bail. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 406 and 420 read with Section 34 of the IPC and Section 3 read with Section 21 (3) of the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act, 2019 .
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the accused, who is one of the Directors of Apollo Jewellery, Vatakara, along with other accused in the crime, wrongfully induced the defacto complainant to deposit amount in an unregulated deposit scheme of the said establishment by offering share of profit. On 10.01.2020, the defacto complainant deposited Rs.25,0
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
