SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 19326

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
K.K.LAKSHMI – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, PALAKKAD – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 12000 OF 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.ANIL KUMAR M.SIVARAMAN
For the Respondents: SRI.T.K.SANDEEP, SMT.RESHMA VISWANATHAN, SMT.SWETHA R., SMT.SILPA N.P., GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The court mandates timely action by authorities to address public grievances regarding infrastructure repair as per prior directives.

Headnote:This writ petition was filed by the petitioner seeking directions to the respondents to take measures regarding the repair of bunds/culverts as per an earlier judgment. The court, based on report Ext.P5, ordered the respondents to expedite remedial action. The court emphasized the importance of immediate action to address flooding and agricultural risks in the area.

Result: The writ petition is disposed of, directing the relevant respondent to take effective steps within six months.

Table of Content
1. background of the petitioner's grievance. (Para 1)
2. court's reception of arguments by both sides. (Para 2 , 3)
3. court's direction for remedial action. (Para 4)

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is stated to be the Secretary of the Padasekhara Samithy. Pursuant to the directions of this Court in Ext.P1 judgment, the respondents therein were directed to reconstruct certain bunds/culverts with the assistance of the Block/Grama Panchayat. The case of the petitioner is that, only two culverts were constructed, and no steps were taken for carrying out repair/renovation of the major culvert and the bund. On account of this, the petitioner states that the flooding in the area is unremedied. The petitioner relies on Ext.P5 report prepared by the 4th respondent Agriculture Officer, as per which, emergent steps required to be taken for ensuring free flow of water so as to carry on agricultural activities in the padasekharam. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking directions to respondents 2, 3 and 5 to take note of the report at Ext.P5 and to take remedial measures within a time frame.

2. Heard Sri.Anil Kumar M.Sivaraman, the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as Smt.Silpa N.P., the learned Government Pleader.

3. Smt.Silpa, the learned Government Pleader, on the basis of the instructions received, would submit that on the basis of the report, steps have also been taken towards remedial measures, and an estimate has been prepared for the construction of the culvert.

4. In my opinion, in the light of the report at Ext.P5 noticed earlier, it is for the respondents to take immediate steps so as to redress the grievances pointed out by the petitioner.

In such circumstances, this writ petition would stand disposed of, directing the 3rd respondent herein to take effective steps on the basis of the report at Ext.P5, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top