SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 19421

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.M.MANOJ, J
L. SHAN PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
R. DORAISWAMY – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 2137 OF 2025 | WP(C) NO.27728 OF 2019



Important Points

Compliance with court orders must be established for contempt proceedings to proceed.

Subject

Civil - Contempt of Court

Headnote

The contempt petition alleges non-compliance with the directions of the judgment dated 12.03.2025, which ordered reinstatement of the petitioner with backwages. The court noted that an appeal had been filed against this judgment. It was submitted that the order has been complied with, resulting in the dismissal of the contempt petition. The final order concluded with, 'Accordingly, the same is closed.'

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.B.ASHOK SHENOY, SRI.P.S.GIREESH, SHRI.UMASANKER U.U., SHRI.ADITYA A. SHENOY
For the Respondents: SRI.BINOY VASUDEVAN

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 17th day of March, 2026 The contempt petition is preferred alleging non-

compliance with the directions contained in the judgment dated 12.03.2025. However, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the respondent that a writ appeal has been preferred against the said judgment. It is further submitted that the direction was to reinstate the petitioner in service as Development Officer with 35% of the total backwages, and that the SLP preferred therefrom has also been dismissed.

In such circumstances, the order of the learned Single Judge stands confirmed. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the order has been complied with. In the above circumstances, no purpose will be served in retaining the contempt petition. Accordingly, the same is closed.

Sd/-

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top